Lauguage that irritates you

A temporary board while I'm working out issues with the real WD.

The posts made here will not appear on the real WD when it re-opens.

Please note that I won't be providing any technical support for this board, as I would prefer to focus my attention on fixing the other board. So, if you're confused by anything, just try to figure things out, search the phpBB forums, ask other users for help, or just bear with it.
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Ghost »

I like, saw this, and like totally, like thought of , like this discussion!

http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/200 ... =500&h=375
X
talula
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:54 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by talula »

I just said amn't like 30 times out loud, trying to make it sound like a contraction of am and not. I still don't know if I'm saying it right. And my cat is looking at me strangely.
Sarah
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:34 am

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Sarah »

"Amn't" (I pronounce it "amint," i.e., "am" and "int," though the i is really a schwa, of course) should make a comeback. It makes much more sense than "aren't": after all, does one say, "I are not hungry at the moment"? Usually, anyway?
Gandalf
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:47 am

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Gandalf »

Sarah wrote:after all, does one say, "I are not hungry at the moment"? Usually, anyway?
Well no, but I wouldn't say "I aren't hungry at the moment" either. I'd say "I'm not hungry at the moment". Still a contraction of "I am not", just in a different form.
Lucretia
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:31 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Lucretia »

Sarah wrote:
P.S. I like the typo in your subject line.
Yay!

Ten poits!
Lucretia
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:31 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Lucretia »

Ghost wrote:I want a haunted car! How do I get one???

BTW, there's a typo in your subject line too.

Damn, there's one in mine too!
lolhaha u suk!
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Ghost »

Lucretia wrote:
lolhaha u suk!
Does that turn you on? [eyebrow]
X
Sarah
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:34 am

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Sarah »

Gandalf wrote:Well no, but I wouldn't say "I aren't hungry at the moment" either. I'd say "I'm not hungry at the moment". Still a contraction of "I am not", just in a different form.
True. It was a bad example. Aren't I blushing now!
Post Reply