But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

A temporary board while I'm working out issues with the real WD.

The posts made here will not appear on the real WD when it re-opens.

Please note that I won't be providing any technical support for this board, as I would prefer to focus my attention on fixing the other board. So, if you're confused by anything, just try to figure things out, search the phpBB forums, ask other users for help, or just bear with it.
mouse
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 12:04 am

But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by mouse »

I seriously just whined that when I read this.


*sniff*


*pout*
"The massage area. Why? To increase the nudity." ~Joss Whedon

"It's a miraculous thing, the hoohoo. I once saw a woman fit one of those minicars full of clowns in her hoohoo." ~Ghost

"Two by two, boobs of blue." ~MenleyNin
Gandalf
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:47 am

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by Gandalf »

This really sucks! I got an email about it just before I came here and was really disappointed. Never mind having to wait longer for the film, I just love going to see Harry Potter films in the run up to Christmas. It seems more natural somehow, like the guy in that article says. They don't really feel like summer movies.

It really sucks! Bad idea! :cry:
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by Ghost »

Ok, I just read a story that says that Harry Potter gets naked in the last film and Radcliff is going to do it. Does he really get naked?
X
mouse
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 12:04 am

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by mouse »

I really don't remember him getting naked in the last book.


But Radcliffe already got all kinds of naked in Equis, so that's nothing new.
"The massage area. Why? To increase the nudity." ~Joss Whedon

"It's a miraculous thing, the hoohoo. I once saw a woman fit one of those minicars full of clowns in her hoohoo." ~Ghost

"Two by two, boobs of blue." ~MenleyNin
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by Ghost »

There is a difference between him getting naked for a theater production and him getting naked for a film based on a book aimed at children.
X
Gandalf
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:47 am

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by Gandalf »

That's the first I've heard of it, and I can't recall any instances where it would be required. Where did you read this? I really can't imagine them doing this since, like you say, it's a film aimed mainly at younger people (despite the increasingly adult themes in later books). If they did something like that, the rating would bump up, and they'd cut out half their target audience. It doesn't make any sense from a studio/money men point of view.
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by Ghost »

Gandalf wrote:That's the first I've heard of it, and I can't recall any instances where it would be required. Where did you read this? I really can't imagine them doing this since, like you say, it's a film aimed mainly at younger people (despite the increasingly adult themes in later books). If they did something like that, the rating would bump up, and they'd cut out half their target audience. It doesn't make any sense from a studio/money men point of view.
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/celeb/arti ... otter.html
Daniel Radcliffe has revealed he will appear naked in the next Harry Potter film.

The actor - who has starred as the teen wizard in five movies in the franchise based on the books by J.K. Rowling - admits he was unsure when he was told he would be appearing without trousers in a scene in 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows'.
X
CosmicAvatar

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by CosmicAvatar »

It's a pity. I do like my geekery spread out over the year.
Sarah
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:34 am

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by Sarah »

I can't imagine they'll go for full frontal, so it'll just be another shot of a bare bum--the stuff of PG.
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Post by Ghost »

But again, inappropriate for a movie based on a children's book.
X
Post Reply