Page 2 of 3

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:09 am
by Sylvain
Without pants does not mean naked. If it's true then it probably means he'll be sleeping in boxers and a shirt on the camping trip.

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:42 am
by Christine
Ghost wrote:But again, inappropriate for a movie based on a children's book.
Oh, come on. I seriously doubt that even if any of this is true, what will probably amount to a split second of Daniel Radcliffe's nekkid bum (which I have no feelings toward whatsoever, btw) will cause severe trauma to children. I'd even venture so far as to say they might have seen a nekkid bum before. *gasp!* (I KNOW! Shocking.)

Besides, as Sylvain has pointed out, appearing without trousers does not even remotely equal appearing naked; and even if that were the case in this instance, I am certain that nothing sexual would be implied.

Seriously. Seriously.

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:06 pm
by JupiterAmy
Um ... Daniel Radcliffe already appeared naked in the fourth movie.

Seriously.

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:07 am
by Sarah
What Christine said.

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:51 am
by MdmeAlbertine
Re-listening to Deathly Hallows on audio book, and I've come across the place where Harry sheds his clothes. He strips down to his skivvies when he tries to get the Sword of Griffendor out of the pool in the forest.

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:02 am
by bettie
MdmeAlbertine wrote:Re-listening to Deathly Hallows on audio book, and I've come across the place where Harry sheds his clothes. He strips down to his skivvies when he tries to get the Sword of Griffendor out of the pool in the forest.
OH NO! THE HORROR! WON'T SOMEONE THINKING OF THE CHILDREN?

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 5:45 pm
by MdmeAlbertine
Another naked scene! This time with no skivvies. After Voldemort "kills" Harry, Harry meets Dumbledore in King's Cross station. He wakes up with no clothes, but wishes for robes and they appear.

Might need an X rating, huh?

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:17 pm
by JupiterAmy
Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.

I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?

NC-17, totes.

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:19 am
by Soupytwist
JupiterAmy wrote:Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.

I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?

NC-17, totes.
HAWT.

Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)

Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:00 am
by Gandalf
JupiterAmy wrote:Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.

I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?

NC-17, totes.
My god, between this and the scenes that MdmeAlbertine has mentioned, the DVD for this will have be behind one of those curtains in the video store! :shock: