Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:09 am
Without pants does not mean naked. If it's true then it probably means he'll be sleeping in boxers and a shirt on the camping trip.
Killing time while the real WD gets some work done.
https://buffyguide.com/temp-forums/
Oh, come on. I seriously doubt that even if any of this is true, what will probably amount to a split second of Daniel Radcliffe's nekkid bum (which I have no feelings toward whatsoever, btw) will cause severe trauma to children. I'd even venture so far as to say they might have seen a nekkid bum before. *gasp!* (I KNOW! Shocking.)Ghost wrote:But again, inappropriate for a movie based on a children's book.
OH NO! THE HORROR! WON'T SOMEONE THINKING OF THE CHILDREN?MdmeAlbertine wrote:Re-listening to Deathly Hallows on audio book, and I've come across the place where Harry sheds his clothes. He strips down to his skivvies when he tries to get the Sword of Griffendor out of the pool in the forest.
HAWT.JupiterAmy wrote:Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.
I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?
NC-17, totes.
My god, between this and the scenes that MdmeAlbertine has mentioned, the DVD for this will have be behind one of those curtains in the video store!JupiterAmy wrote:Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.
I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?
NC-17, totes.