Lauguage that irritates you

A temporary board while I'm working out issues with the real WD.

The posts made here will not appear on the real WD when it re-opens.

Please note that I won't be providing any technical support for this board, as I would prefer to focus my attention on fixing the other board. So, if you're confused by anything, just try to figure things out, search the phpBB forums, ask other users for help, or just bear with it.
Lucretia
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:31 pm

Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Lucretia »

(Knowing me, I will make a spelling/grammatical error in this post ............)

[*] Most people bank monkey workers in Scotland have a habit of saying, for example, "The fund have went", mixing up "The funds went ..." and "the funds have gone". It's so fundamentally wrong, it makes me blood boil. Did their parents not teach them English?
[*] Text speak. In texts, and in e-mails. "Did u go to dat plc? luv u hun. ure so sexi". ARRRGHH.
[*] "That's cliche". Eh? It's "clichéd"
[*] "I could care less". " ....................??"

Things I say that annoy the hell out of my parents;

[*] "Lucy and me ..." He says "LUCY AND IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII !!!!"
[*] I contract "I am not" to "I amn't" - and I know it's totally wrong but it's a really crap habit I picked up as a child
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Ghost »

But U R so SeXi!1!1!
X
JupiterAmy

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by JupiterAmy »

Lucretia wrote: [*] "Lucy and me ..." He says "LUCY AND IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII !!!!"
I seriously hate when people over-correct this one. It's not 'Lucy and I' in all situations!
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Ghost »

The way my teacher taught me this when I was just a small child was to omit the "Lucy and" part of the sentence. If it reads correctly without the other party, then it is correct. Now they try to get us to understand whether Lucy and I are subjects or objects and Lucy really hates it when I objectify her.
X
Iago
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:05 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Iago »

JupiterAmy wrote:I seriously hate when people over-correct this one. It's not 'Lucy and I' in all situations!
Yeah, I hate when people go overboard on this one, too.

While it's incorrect to say "Lucy and me went to the store," it's just an honest mistake.

But when someone says "between you and I", I want to bang their head against a wall. It's not just incorrect, they went out of their way to be incorrect because they thought "you and I" sounds educated. It's like using a big word, and then getting it wrong.

I have a friend who sometimes says "between you and I." At times like that, if you listen real carefully, you can hear the baby Jesus crying.
Sarah
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:34 am

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Sarah »

I have many peeves of this sort but of course am finding it difficult to remember them. Still, a few spring to mind . . .

I hate it when people make the mistake illustrated in "If I would have known, I would have done something else."

I hate the mistake illustrated in "I bought that car, which I wouldn't have bought it if I'd known it was haunted."

I, too, hate "between you and I" and its siblings.

Of course I hate all the misplaced apostrophes that now litter the world.

There are scads more. In fact, it's just as well I can't think of them, because the list would be just too damn long.

P.S. I like the typo in your subject line.
Ghost
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by Ghost »

I want a haunted car! How do I get one???

BTW, there's a typo in your subject line too.

Damn, there's one in mine too!
X
PommeVerte
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Quebec

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by PommeVerte »

The cool thing here is that while people rant, I learn.

Please continue.

Ho but before you do, I have a question for you guys.

Since I didn't find a straight, official answer on the net, I thought "Well, that's just a perfect question for the people at the WD" (I'm still impressed by the 'third cousin twice removed' post, even though I don't remember the actual rule :o ).

The question:

How do you write "3 year old" in the expression "a 3-year-old document"??
- 3 year old?
- 3-year old? (that's how my colleague wrote it)
- 3-year-old? (that would be my pick)
- 3 year-old?
- other __________.

Thanks.
bettie
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:58 pm

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by bettie »

PommeVerte wrote:How do you write "3 year old" in the expression "a 3-year-old document"??
I'd go with your pick:
PommeVerte wrote:- 3-year-old? (that would be my pick)
Only I'd write out the number, so it would be three-year-old. (Strunk and White tell us to write out single digit numbers. I do as Strunk and White tell me.)
MenleyNin
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:19 am
Contact:

Re: Lauguage that irritates you

Post by MenleyNin »

PommeVerte wrote: How do you write "3 year old" in the expression "a 3-year-old document"??
When you use it as an adjective, it should be hyphenated:

"I have a three-year-old document I need to print."

When it's not used as an adjective, it should not be hyphenated:

"I have a three year old who is not potty trained."

That's how I learned it in Advanced Composition. I hope that rule still holds true!
Post Reply