But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Without pants does not mean naked. If it's true then it probably means he'll be sleeping in boxers and a shirt on the camping trip.
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Oh, come on. I seriously doubt that even if any of this is true, what will probably amount to a split second of Daniel Radcliffe's nekkid bum (which I have no feelings toward whatsoever, btw) will cause severe trauma to children. I'd even venture so far as to say they might have seen a nekkid bum before. *gasp!* (I KNOW! Shocking.)Ghost wrote:But again, inappropriate for a movie based on a children's book.
Besides, as Sylvain has pointed out, appearing without trousers does not even remotely equal appearing naked; and even if that were the case in this instance, I am certain that nothing sexual would be implied.
Seriously. Seriously.
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Um ... Daniel Radcliffe already appeared naked in the fourth movie.
Seriously.
Seriously.
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
What Christine said.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:30 pm
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Re-listening to Deathly Hallows on audio book, and I've come across the place where Harry sheds his clothes. He strips down to his skivvies when he tries to get the Sword of Griffendor out of the pool in the forest.
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
OH NO! THE HORROR! WON'T SOMEONE THINKING OF THE CHILDREN?MdmeAlbertine wrote:Re-listening to Deathly Hallows on audio book, and I've come across the place where Harry sheds his clothes. He strips down to his skivvies when he tries to get the Sword of Griffendor out of the pool in the forest.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:30 pm
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Another naked scene! This time with no skivvies. After Voldemort "kills" Harry, Harry meets Dumbledore in King's Cross station. He wakes up with no clothes, but wishes for robes and they appear.
Might need an X rating, huh?
Might need an X rating, huh?
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.
I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?
NC-17, totes.
I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?
NC-17, totes.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:06 am
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
HAWT.JupiterAmy wrote:Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.
I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?
NC-17, totes.
Re: But...*why*? (re: Harry Potter)
My god, between this and the scenes that MdmeAlbertine has mentioned, the DVD for this will have be behind one of those curtains in the video store!JupiterAmy wrote:Don't forget there's also the scene with the Polyjuice Potion, where multiple Harrys have to strip off all their clothes, and Actual Harry has to remind them to spare him some decency.
I mean, that's the scene I assumed we were talking about, but I guess I'm the only one who remembered that part?
NC-17, totes.
